← CASE STUDIES
CASE / 002

$3K in Google Ads spend generated $70K+ in solar installation orders

A seasonal Google Ads campaign for a solar installation company generated roughly 100 leads at about $30 CPL and more than $70,000 in orders.

IndustrySolar installation
MarketUkraine
PeriodSeasonal campaign
WorkGoogle Ads / GTM / GA4 / Lead conversion tracking
$3,000Ad spend
~$30Average CPL
$70K+Order value
23x+Order value / ad spend

01 / CONTEXT

What was happening

Solar installation is a high-ticket lead generation market where a small number of qualified enquiries can create substantial revenue. The campaign needed to capture people already considering an installation, keep lead acquisition efficient and give the sales team enough volume to convert during the active season.

02 / THE PROBLEM

The constraint that mattered

The account could not be managed around traffic volume or cheap clicks. The commercial goal was to generate a predictable flow of quote-ready leads at a CPL that still made sense against the value of a completed solar installation. Measurement had to connect Google Ads activity with real lead actions before scaling.

03 / AUDIT FINDINGS

01

Lead quality mattered more than raw lead volume because each successful installation carried significant order value.

02

The strongest opportunity sat in high-intent searches from users actively comparing installation options and requesting quotes.

03

Google Ads, GTM and GA4 needed to work as one measurement stack so optimization was based on real lead actions.

04

Seasonality made budget timing critical: spend had to be concentrated when installation demand and sales capacity were strongest.

04 / WHAT CHANGED

Interventions, not generic recommendations.

01 / MEASUREMENT

Rebuilt lead measurement with GTM and GA4

Configured conversion tracking around meaningful enquiry actions so Google Ads could optimize toward actual leads rather than generic engagement metrics.

02 / INTENT

Concentrated spend on installation-ready demand

Built the acquisition strategy around searches with clear commercial intent, reducing the role of broad research traffic and prioritizing users closer to requesting a quote.

03 / BUDGET

Scaled around an acceptable CPL

Used lead cost as the primary efficiency guardrail and kept acquisition around the ~$30 CPL level while the campaign generated enough volume for the sales team.

04 / SEASONALITY

Matched advertising pressure to the sales season

Focused budget during the periods when installation demand was strongest, allowing the business to return to the same acquisition model season after season.

05 / Proof

Only screenshots that prove something.

These slots are deliberately explicit so the final case uses cropped, contextual evidence rather than decorative dashboard screenshots.

06 / RESULTS

01
Approximately 100 leads from $3,000 in media spend

At an average CPL of roughly $30, the campaign produced around 100 enquiries during the active period.

02
$70,000+ in resulting orders

The leads generated through the campaign converted into more than $70,000 in solar installation orders.

03
23x+ order value relative to ad spend

More than $70K in orders against roughly $3K in Google Ads spend puts order value at over 23 times media cost.

04
A repeatable seasonal acquisition channel

The economics were strong enough for the company to continue using the campaign model during subsequent active seasons.

Measurement note

Primary conversionLead / quote request
AttributionGoogle Ads + GA4
ValidationGTM + GA4 conversion tracking
ComparisonCampaign-level lead and order economics

START AN EXPERIMENT

Have a similar Google Ads or measurement problem?

Send the context. I’ll tell you what I would inspect first and whether I can help.

Discuss a project